If any mathematician disagrees with this, then please answer this question: If it is acceptable for Wiles to use RH, an unproved hypothesis, to prove FLT, then can Wiles now also to use FLT in reverse to prove the unproved RH?
If any mathematician disagrees with this, then please answer this question: If it is acceptable for Wiles to use RH, an unproved hypothesis, to prove FLT, then can Wiles now also to use FLT in reverse to prove the unproved RH?
如果任何数学家对此不同意，那么请回答这样一个问题∶如果能够接受怀尔斯使用黎曼假设，一个未经证明的假说／假设，对费马大定理进行证明的话，那么由于同样理由，怀尔斯现在是否也可以用费马大定理反过来证明尚未证明的黎曼假设？