When Lomborg restates the number of lost species as a percentage of total species, is he simply showing the true size of the problem or is he perhaps also trying to trivialize it?
When Lomborg restates the number of lost species as a percentage of total species, is he simply showing the true size of the problem or is he perhaps also trying to trivialize it?
隆伯格一再地以比例来谈灭绝物种的数量，他只是想说明问题的规模呢，或者是大事化小、小事化无的手法呢？